Skip navigation

Book Reviews

A Partisan Affair: A Response to Edward Humes’ Inaccurate History of Kitzmiller v. Dover and Intelligent Design, "Monkey Girl"

Response to Dr. Joan Roughgarden's Review of Michael Behe's The Edge of Evolution

Intelligent Design 101: A Reply to Francis Collins’s Darwinian Arguments for Common Ancestry of Apes and Humans

New ID Book Contains Rebuttal to Francis Collins' The Language of God

The Facts about Intelligent Design: A Response to the National Academy of Sciences’ Science, Evolution, and Creationism

Release of Traipsing Into Evolution

Review of The Politically Incorrect Guide to Darwinism and Intelligent Design

Icons Still Standing, a defense of Icons of Evolution

Version 2.4 (last updated 3/14/02); Jonathan Wells Comes Up Clean, Despite Harsh Criticism

The Evolutionary Gospel According to Sean B. Carroll

Review of Sean B. Carroll’s The Making of the Fittest (W.W. Norton, 2006)

Some Interesting Excerpts from Ernst Mayr’s “What Evolution Is” (Basic Books, 2002)

Sean Carroll Fails to Scale The Edge of Evolution: A Rebuttal to Sean Carroll's Anti-ID Book Review in Science

A Review and Evaluation of Mark Perakh's “Unintelligent Design”

"The Dawkins Delusion:" Right on Dawkins, Wrong on Intelligent Design

Does The Panda’s Black Box “mov[e] beyond mere name-calling and finger-pointing” or continue the Darwinian trend?

A Review of The Panda’s Black Box

What I did on My Summer Vacation: A Book Report and Summary of Steven Stanley’s The New Evolutionary Timetable Timetable: Fossils, Genes, and the Origin of Species

New Book: Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA

Appendicitis: Corrections to the Appendix of Why Intelligent Design Fails

Case for a Creator

An Excellent Resource

Corrections and Comments to statements made about the IDEA Center in Creationism's Trojan Horse

Critical Review of Robert T. Pennock's Tower of Babel, the Evidence Against the New Creationism

A Critical Analysis of Science and Creationism: A View from the National Academy of Sciences (2nd. ed)

Icons Haven't Lost Their Touch

A Response to Eugenie Scott